No matter what it was, the development was underscored by a conflicting, opposing viewpoint. It was so obvious to everyone that we were "the people." Often the writers offered some take on the future. It was usually unabashedly nationalistic in a way you never see today outside of a People magazine feature on a returning soldier. Some of the writing in Life was very good. This is somewhat akin to the feelings I experience while reading Life magazine today. When I saw his wife in the student center the following week, I felt so sorry for her I almost cried. He asked me what this thing did, and I told him it was the mouse. He was so pathetically lost I found I could never listen to any of his lectures again. That day he happened to be setting up a new desktop computer. The time came for me to speak with the man in his office hours. ![]() (Literatures of nascent countries are almost always terrible.) Despite this handicap, he threw himself into the topic with aplomb. His speciality was 18th century American literature, generally thought of as one of the most boring areas of art to study outside of the middle ages. He attracted swarms of undergraduates to his office hours. He had a beautiful home and family his lectures were prescient and entertaining. Once I had a professor who seemed to have everything going right in his life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |